Talk:AllegroGraph

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Databases, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DatabasesWikipedia:WikiProject DatabasesTemplate:WikiProject DatabasesDatabases

Software: Computing Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 April 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Issues with sources

The first two references are copies of the same ... press release? And the link titled "Kodak Article" is the same EE Times article. The DBPedia Germany link barely mentions AllegroGraph and is not really significant coverage. The Pfizer article is behind a paygate; while I did get a quick look at it the first time I loaded the page, I could not determine if the coverage discussed the subject enough to be considered supportive of notability.

The rest of the links simply go to corporations' pages, and do not really support the article at all. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 20:59, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article is poorly sourced and of overall low quality, but that's a rationale for improvement, not deletion. AllegroGraph is notable and relevant in the Semantic Web community. Google Scholar returns a handy list of good references. Sboucher (talk) 23:06, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

COI

I've added {{coi}} because the author (Craig Norvell) is Franz's Vice President of Global Sales and Marketing. That in itself is not necessarily a problem, but there are verifiability issues, no assertion of notability, etc. that need to be fixed. -- samj _in ^out 10:39, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]