Jump to content

User talk:82.111.128.3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 82.111.128.3 (talk) at 17:03, 8 March 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, 82.111.128.3, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ONUnicorn 20:27, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On your changes to Misandry

Hi. The existing list of examples of pop-culture showing misandry are taken from the first two books in the bibliography — which are purported to verify the connection to misandry. To avoid adding unverified examples of misandry, please support each with references. This is a controversial article, so it needs thorough referencing. Rintrah 18:55, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Eric Chester on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -David Schaich Talk/Cont 21:04, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to John Goodsall, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --Elkman - (Elkspeak) 00:12, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

reversions in Socialist Party USA

Thank you for experimenting with the page Socialist Party USA on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -David Schaich Talk/Cont 16:25, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is my constructive contributions that are being vandalised! Stop the ones that are vandalising them, and abusing the reverting option —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.111.128.3 (talkcontribs) 17:57, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

reversions in Misandry

The edits you are repeatedly re-inserting have already been discussed at some length. If you don't wish to be repeatedly reverted, you will need to adapt your approach to accommodate the already mentioned concerns, or at least give much more persuasive reasons on the Talk Page.

If this is not satisfying to you, Wikipedia does provide a dispute resolution process of which you may take advantage, but Talk Page discussion is still the first step. / edgarde 17:55, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I have deleted some earlier parts in the Misandry in Western Culture which I thought either didn't have references or weren't part of a widely known phenomenon. I cannot agree to the deletion of parts which fall under the referenced/widely known category.

Thanks for your reply!
I haven't read your latest changes (busy day), but one thing to keep in mind is that items on that list need to actually document misandry. Lists of "reasons it may be disadvantageous to be born male" do not by themselves do this.
A good way to make this work would be to provide references of someone (authors Nathanson and Young come up a lot) explaining how these things actually demonstrate misandry (or at least the author's concept thereof).

The issues I mention have to do with structural violence, and structural cultural repression and hostility towards solving the problems. The fact so many men lead such wretched existence is a pattern of the misandry in society.

Good luck. Thanks for helping Wikipedia. / edgarde 19:07, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]