Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gsthae with tempo!/Archive

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations | Gsthae with tempo!
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TheSandDoctor (talk | contribs) at 22:44, 7 January 2023 (Archiving case section from w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gsthae with tempo! (using spihelper.js)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Gsthae with tempo!

29 August 2016

Suspected sockpuppets


Creation of nonsense articles with the same content and similar name pattern ("Mixing.Sailors").

  1. Now deleted nonsense article #1 by Gouzo135
  2. Now deleted nonsense article #2 by Gouzo135
  3. Mixing_Sailоrs Nonsense article by Glouxnef138 with (from memory) same/similar content as the deleted articles, currently flagged for speedy deletion Fëanor (talk) 16:36, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

22 June 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Requesting CheckUser to identify any other recent socks creating nonsense pages; this has been going on for years as seen in archived report. See also [1] and [2]. Home Lander (talk) 21:29, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

06 July 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

That's a lot of time I'm never getting back. Sdrqaz (talk) 22:39, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • Thanks Sdrqaz, they're definitely one of the weirder editors I've come across in my time here, and I think that's saying a lot. DanCherek (talk) 02:42, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is a cross-wiki abuse case and have been around for quite some time and I've been chasing this across at 10-15 wikis. A quick source code search of undeleted pages can be found here. A check here would probably be useless as this abuser rarely edits actively and is IP hopping. @GeneralNotability: This case is basically this. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:00, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

01 December 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

I’m not too familiar with this part of Wikipedia, so let me know if you need any clarification.

These are throwaway accounts that have been used to create one nonsense draft, which is then deleted, and the account isn’t heard from again.

There’s a similarity between these accounts’ names and those of the throwaways that created the ‘12 dwarves’ series (see my CSD log for those; they’re all in November).

They follow the same pattern of two or three names followed by a space (important) and then a random string of numbers.

Tamzin also recommended that I request CheckUser on these accounts in order to see if a rangeblock is feasible. ◇HelenDegenerate◆ 00:31, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

01 December 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

See other report. ◇HelenDegenerate◆ 00:31, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

27 November 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

I was advised to come here by @Tamzin:. She said that the more people who know about this, the better. I recently discovered an LTA (been going on for months) whose activity was obscured by the fact that their drafts were always deleted. This person creates a draft with a G1 title and contents, then after it’s deleted, recreates it under a visually similar name. This draft that this IP created is identical to these: [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. She blocked the IPs who created the other drafts. This one looks like a duck to me. ◇HelenDegenerate◆ 21:10, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

05 January 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

User created a nonsense draft + username matches the pattern that I pointed out in an earlier report. Requesting CU because I haven’t seen this particular nonsense draft before (they tend to come up with one and then recreate it under different names), but the style of nonsense used is pretty distinct. Compare with [10] and you'll see what I mean. ◇HelenDegenerate◆ 21:03, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Ernest Gabord-Lacour 454 below and Norbert Elton Sparrow 180 are confirmed to each other; they're on a different range as the last ones, but geolocating to the same place. Don't see any more on that range. Blocked and tagged, closing. Girth Summit (blether) 13:06, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Gsthae_with_tempo!/Archive&oldid=1132236064"