Jump to content

Talk:Upwind differencing scheme for convection

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by PianoDan (talk | contribs) at 18:41, 9 December 2022 (Rate as start). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconPhysics Unassessed Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The title of this page is wrong.

It should be "Upwind differencing scheme for advection" "convection" is something different

Single source? Transportiveness?

Any more sources? Is this actually used? What is Transportiveness? This whole entry is dubious and badly written. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2Paule (talkcontribs) 18:38, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Needs revision or should be removed

This page is not useful. The discussion is limited to a very specific low-order scheme applied to a particular form of the convection-diffusion equation. It is based on a single source. I would recommend abandoning/removing this and broadening the discussion presented in the 'Upwind scheme' page (which I have not contributed to) where a proper treatment can be found. Jcandy (talk) 07:30, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Should be removed and merged with the Upwind scheme page

This article is poorly written and cites about 15 pages of a single textbook. While this differencing scheme might be useful in some fields it should fall under the larger 'Upwind scheme' page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.151.223.182 (talk) 16:40, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]