Jump to content

Open-source voting system

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Superb Owl (talk | contribs) at 04:17, 9 December 2022 (Security and trust: copyediting to soften language). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

An open-source voting system (OSVS), also known as open-source voting (or OSV), is a voting system that uses open-source software (and/or hardware) that is completely transparent in its design in order to be checked by anyone for bugs or issues. Free and open-source systems can be adapted and used by others without paying licensing fees, improving the odds they achieve the scale usually needed for long-term success.[1] The development of open-source voting technology has shown a small but steady trend towards increased adoption since the first systems were put into practice in 2018.[2]

Significance

Security and trust

Systems where anyone can check the code serve a similar function to that of election observers who help to inspire trust with increased transparency and verification.[2] With quicker identification and correction of issues than under proprietary systems, organizations such as the U.S. Defense Department and NASA opt to incorporate open-source software.[3] Cities, for example, can have their own staff work on software with the vendors when out in the open, allowing for faster patches and enhancing their election security.[4] The consensus among the information security community is that a widely-used open-source system should be more secure than a closed one, as more people tend to be invested in checking for vulnerabilities.[5]

Cost Savings

In addition to increased transparency creating more trust and security, open-source software can lower costs for elections. A VotingWorks bid in a Mississippi county, for example, was 50% less than vendors using proprietary software.[6] Open-source software allows maintenance costs to be controlled via vendor competition (rather than dependence on just a couple vendors), and to be shared with other jurisdictions as they employ the software.[7]

Development milestones

In 2019, Microsoft made it's ElectionGuard software open-source, which the company claims is used by all major manufacturers of voting systems (in the United States).[8] In 2020, Los Angeles County became the first U.S. jurisdiction to implement its own publicly-owned election system.[9] A condition of the Secretary of State's approval was to open-source the code by October 1, 2021,[10] but no evidence of follow-through on that condition or commitment by the County of Los Angeles has been uncovered as of late 2022. San Francisco applied to run a limited pilot in November 2022, but California's Secretary of State wanted the City to resubmit their application when VotingWorks' ranked-choice voting module was closer to completion.[11]

Adoption

Mississippi was the first state to have local jurisdictions use open-source voting systems to cast and count ballots. In New Hampshire, the towns of Ashland, Newington and Woodstock piloted that same open-sourced software system in the fall of 2022 with an eye to statewide adoption of VotingWorks' open-source systems by 2024.[2]

Open-source election risk-limiting audit systems have been implemented statewide in the U.S. states of Georgia[12], Michigan, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Virginia and in local jurisdictions in California, Nevada, New Jersey, North Carolina, and Washington.[13]

See also

References

  1. ^ "2017-2018 Civil Grand Jury Report on Open Source Voting in San Francisco" (PDF). Retrieved December 5, 2022.
  2. ^ a b c "3 N.H. towns are testing out new ballot counting machines that use open source software". www.wbur.org. November 8, 2022. Retrieved 2022-11-25.
  3. ^ Cooper, David L. (2017). "Translation and the Making of Modern Russian Literature. By Brian James Baer . New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2016. x, 213 pp. Notes. Bibliography. Index. $25.99, paper". Slavic Review. 76 (1): 276–277. doi:10.1017/slr.2017.67. ISSN 0037-6779. S2CID 164524276.[irrelevant citation]
  4. ^ Elder, Jeff (November 14, 2021). "How one company came to control San Francisco's elections". San Francisco Examiner. Retrieved 2022-12-04.
  5. ^ "2017-2018 Civil Grand Jury Report on Open Source Voting in San Francisco" (PDF). Retrieved December 5, 2022.
  6. ^ Guizerix, Anna (2021-08-18). "Warren County Supervisors approve purchase of new voting machines". The Vicksburg Post. Retrieved 2022-12-04.
  7. ^ San Francisco Open Source Voting Technical Advisory Committee. May 14th 2019 Meeting. Committee Member Brandon Phillips. p. 39. https://osvtac.github.io/files/meetings/2020/2020-03-12/packet/DT_OSV_State_of_Art_Briefing_Feb_2020.pdf
  8. ^ "Microsoft makes its open-source secure voting software available to all". Engadget. Retrieved 2022-12-04.
  9. ^ "AP20:091 Los Angeles County VSAP 2.1 Voting System Certified :: California Secretary of State". www.sos.ca.gov. Retrieved 2022-12-05.
  10. ^ "Conditional Approval of Los Angeles County's Voting Solutions for All People (VSAP) 2.1 Voting System" by Alex Padilla, California Secretary of State. October 1, 2020. Condition 28, p. 6. https://votingsystems.cdn.sos.ca.gov/vendors/LAC/vsap2-1/vsap21-cert.pdf
  11. ^ "Update on Open-Source Pilot Program." Letter from Shirley N. Weber, California Secretary of State to John Arntz and the City and County of San Francisco. May 6, 2022. https://sfgov.org/electionscommission/sites/default/files/Documents/meetings/2022/2022-11-16-commission/Attachment%201.pdf
  12. ^ "Georgia Sec. of State chooses own race for election audit". 11Alive.com. 12:31 PM EST November 10, 2022. Retrieved 2022-12-09. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  13. ^ "VotingWorks FAQ". www.voting.works. Retrieved 2022-12-04.