Jump to content

User talk:PostScript/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by PostScript (talk | contribs) at 04:20, 4 March 2007 (Ben 10 GA Nomination: Fixed formating.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Rita Image

I have nominated the picture Rita 2005 five day track.gif for deletion because it is not needed anymore. It says on the image page that one of your pages links to it. Just letting you know so you can remove the link. Miss Michelle | Talk to Michelle 21:00, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I had a confusion with my talk page and didn't see your message. I'm very sorry to say I don't understand. --PostScript 04:17, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Requested Template

Category:Image request templates. These go on talk pages. Circeus 14:33, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll keep that in mind. --PostScript 04:17, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Ben 10

Aside from the information removal, it wasn't styled very well. Trivia sections, for example, are frowned upon when they can be merged. Ben's eyes are actually yellowish, but that's moot. There's things like "frequently malfunctions on many occasions" and "only for Ben to escape and leave Vilgax and him trapped", which are fairly redundant wordings. There's other things, too, but that's the gist of it. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 02:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. That really helped, I appreciate it. --PostScript 04:05, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Ben 10 GA Nomination

You recently nominated Ben 10 at Good article candidates. Whilst the article fulfils most of the criteria, it does lack inline citations and references. Think you could fix that? Otherwise it will just fail. Veesicle (Talk) (Contribs) 02:28, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

You see, we have a redundent loop here: the source for all this information for the Ben 10 article is from a fan site, and there already was a talk discussion about not putting heatblast.net as a source, as wiki considers that as advertizing. So how in the world will this article ever get to GA? --PostScript 04:20, 4 March 2007 (UTC)