Talk:Unicode Consortium
![]() | Organizations Start‑class Mid‑importance ![]() | ||||||||||||
|
Website Down?
From Internet Explorer 11 there's "This page can’t be displayed" for Unicode Consortium which is 404?Lmstearn (talk) 06:18, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
- Up today.Lmstearn (talk) 13:12, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Diversity criticism neutrality
Hey! It looks like this section lacks some neutrality, although I haven't edited Wikipedia in a while, so I don't have a current grasp of the neutrality policy:
The UTC accepts documents from any organization or individual, whether they are members of the Unicode Consortium or not.[1][2] The UTC holds its meetings behind closed doors, and its voting members are overwhelmingly white, American, and male.[3] As of July 2020, the UTC rules on both emoji and script proposals at the same meeting.
This is a super important criticism to bring up, but it's pretty jarring in context with the article, surrounded by very neutral statements.
Jamesjpk (talk) 21:54, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Submitting Character Proposals". Unicode Consortium. 2016-04-01. Retrieved 2020-07-11.
- ^ Berard, Bethany (2018-09-01). "I second that emoji: The standards, structures, and social production of emoji". First Monday. doi:10.5210/fm.v23i9.9381. ISSN 1396-0466.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link) - ^ de Jong, Mea Dols (2020-05-04). Beyond the emoji (YouTube video). Deutsche Welle.
- @Jamesjpk: I believe I wrote the sentence but am not sure. However, this is not criticism. UTC meetings are closed to the public. The voting members are overwhelmingly white, American, and male — as are the non-voting participants. I am unsure why you think this is non-neutral. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) please always ping! 19:03, 15 September 2021 (UTC)