Changing back and forth between alternate spellings isn't very productive, but I appreciate that you weren't the first to change it. My major point was your edit summary, in which you called perfectly acceptable alternatives 'typo's, and what's more, called the author 'dumb'. Please try to remain civil. Oliphaunt15:03, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)
Hello, C++ Template, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.
If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
There's various forums for discussions, but Wikipedia isn't one of them. Wikipedia is for encyclopedia articles, and the talk pages are for that end only.--Prosfilaes15:15, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You did the following: "Removed rant ("This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject."))" Ok. So, what is the proper venue for discussion? Respond back at my talk page, thanks.
Ada sucks. Ada is dead. Why do people still use it? Especially some Dod companies? You can do EVERYTHING in C++. Any Ada programmer who claims you can't doesn't know ish about C++. Even call by naming can be done in C++. Explicit type safety can be done. The best is when someone says that they like Ada over C++. They should really just quit and program Ada at home, then. Anyone who thinks such just shouldn't have a job. I hate Ada.
Addendum: If you would like to respond to what I wrote above, please do so on this page instead of my talk page, so that our exchange won't be split to two different pages. Thanks in advance. — Tobias Bergemann15:55, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]