Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of PDF presentation software
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Comparison of PDF presentation software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Has the same problems as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of risk analysis Microsoft Excel add-ins (2nd nomination)/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of power management software suites/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of XMPP server software/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of DNA melting prediction software/etc. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete all but one entry appear to have no claimed reason for notability, so there's no way to establish a useful WP:LSC. Lists (and by extension to an extent, comparisons) of mostly non-notable things are generally non-notable unless there's a clear argument that the broader topic is notable, and I can't think of one here. See also my vote at the XMPP comparisons AfD for a general argument against including these styles of comparison at all: WP:NOTDIRECTORY and the very construction of the page constitutes WP:SYNTH, but these articles have enough prevalence on the wiki that I feel like a broader discussion is merited, so I'm voting here on the more stringent criteria of notability that this seems to fail. Dylnuge (Talk • Edits) 18:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)