Jump to content

Talk:Circuit quantum electrodynamics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ComradePingu1917 (talk | contribs) at 13:21, 28 October 2022 (This article could use some work: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconPhysics Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article could use some work

I'm an undergrad, so I'm not exactly an expert in quantum optics or anything, but I can tell this page needs a quality update. The very first sentence, the "...a means of studying the fundamental interaction between light and matter (quantum optics)," feels very clumsy. As the first reference, Schuster's PhD thesis points out in the abstract, cQED isn't simply quantum optics, it's a framework to study quantum information and quantum optics in macroscopic systems—according to an article in Reviews of Modern Physics, it's the study of superconducting circuits that act like qubits.

The article is also paced quite awkwardly. Why would the resonator be talked about before the Jaynes-Cummings model?

I don't have the time to edit or rewrite this article at the moment, but I'll get to it soon. I'll only be able to make limited changes to the mathematics, since I don't have the tools to fully appreciate it all yet.

ComradePingu1917 (talk) 13:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]