Jump to content

Talk:Electron (software framework)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Eteled286 (talk | contribs) at 20:09, 26 October 2022 (AFAICT it isn't written in Python: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconSoftware: Computing Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Template:Vital article

Controversy around the so-called creator

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/nwjs-general/LIrC7zHtQdo/6Gd5MXVsCAAJ http://cheng.guru/blog/2017/11/20/statement-on-the-statement-on-the-history-of-node-webkit.html


Other noteable Electron apps

Franz https://blog.meetfranz.com/ N1 https://nylas.com/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShalokShalom (talkcontribs) 18:02, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism on memory footprint, efficiency, etc.

Since Electron is essentially a web server and a web browser wrapped around the actual application code (I'm probably over-simplifying to get the point across), there legitimate concerns that Electron might support software bloat more than necessary. (e.g. this rant, or observations like Slack consuming hundreds of megabytes of RAM, etc.) Is there any way to properly formulate that in the article? --Wormbo 15:48, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I have included in the article independently (I just found out your request). Can you check if you agree with my edition?--Jakeukalane (talk) 10:37, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No support from PortableApps.com

PortableApps.com (which has their own article on Wikipedia) does not seem to support any application that uses the Electron framework. The problem is that Electron requires Microsoft Visual Studio (of which Visual Studio Code is also an electron app) for the Windows toolchain. PortableApps likes using the GNU toolchain, nevermind that a lot of Linux developers have joined Mac developers in using the Clang toolchain, which uses a BSD-like license. Here in lies the problem. While the Free Software Foundation is in the right to avoid using Visual Studio, it is a disservice to software developers who want to have a "No Strings Attached" development platform where things like the registry or some other software dependent feature denies the programmer the freedom to just plug in the flashdrive into a USB port and run the software from the flashdrive. Basically, Electron needs to rethink their build instructions for Windows to provide an alternative set of build instructions for folks who do not wish to use the Visual Studio software. The Linux instructions do not require Visual Studio.--Bushido Hacks (talk) 16:20, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning Revision as of 00:19, 10 October 2020, criticism section

Although the reference provided is frequently updated, I believe citing a GitHub repository with Version Control providers' dynamic nature isn't appropriate, this applies generally to repositories. The repository isn't widely seen looking at the issue count and the number of stars, and the criticism inside it links to other sources, which creates layers of citations. I will be looking for more credible and reputable sources for the phrase this citation concerns, and some of the criticism inside it could be incorporated into the criticism section here. 1 --ByrdSC (talk) 18:11, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AFAIK it is not maintained by github

it is just developed on github Eteled286 (talk) 20:07, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AFAICT it isn't written in Python

that is just some build scripts Eteled286 (talk) 20:09, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]