Talk:Electron (software framework)
![]() | Software: Computing Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Electron (software framework) was copied or moved into List of software using Electron with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Controversy around the so-called creator
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/nwjs-general/LIrC7zHtQdo/6Gd5MXVsCAAJ http://cheng.guru/blog/2017/11/20/statement-on-the-statement-on-the-history-of-node-webkit.html
Other noteable Electron apps
Franz https://blog.meetfranz.com/ N1 https://nylas.com/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShalokShalom (talk • contribs) 18:02, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
Criticism on memory footprint, efficiency, etc.
Since Electron is essentially a web server and a web browser wrapped around the actual application code (I'm probably over-simplifying to get the point across), there legitimate concerns that Electron might support software bloat more than necessary. (e.g. this rant, or observations like Slack consuming hundreds of megabytes of RAM, etc.) Is there any way to properly formulate that in the article? --Wormbo 15:48, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello
I have included in the article independently (I just found out your request). Can you check if you agree with my edition?--Jakeukalane (talk) 10:37, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
No support from PortableApps.com
PortableApps.com (which has their own article on Wikipedia) does not seem to support any application that uses the Electron framework. The problem is that Electron requires Microsoft Visual Studio (of which Visual Studio Code is also an electron app) for the Windows toolchain. PortableApps likes using the GNU toolchain, nevermind that a lot of Linux developers have joined Mac developers in using the Clang toolchain, which uses a BSD-like license. Here in lies the problem. While the Free Software Foundation is in the right to avoid using Visual Studio, it is a disservice to software developers who want to have a "No Strings Attached" development platform where things like the registry or some other software dependent feature denies the programmer the freedom to just plug in the flashdrive into a USB port and run the software from the flashdrive. Basically, Electron needs to rethink their build instructions for Windows to provide an alternative set of build instructions for folks who do not wish to use the Visual Studio software. The Linux instructions do not require Visual Studio.--Bushido Hacks (talk) 16:20, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Concerning Revision as of 00:19, 10 October 2020, criticism section
Although the reference provided is frequently updated, I believe citing a GitHub repository with Version Control providers' dynamic nature isn't appropriate, this applies generally to repositories. The repository isn't widely seen looking at the issue count and the number of stars, and the criticism inside it links to other sources, which creates layers of citations. I will be looking for more credible and reputable sources for the phrase this citation concerns, and some of the criticism inside it could be incorporated into the criticism section here. 1 --ByrdSC (talk) 18:11, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
AFAIK it is not maintained by github
it is just developed on github Eteled286 (talk) 20:07, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
AFAICT it isn't written in Python
that is just some build scripts Eteled286 (talk) 20:09, 26 October 2022 (UTC)