Talk:Problematic integration theory

This article is ordered by introduction, history, concepts, current usage, and reference. It is organized well, but the important words in the theory and the definitions do not link to other sites of Wikipedia. It should include relevant references and citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikagu (talk • contribs) 15:00, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good connections between theory and references. Try to incorporate more links within the article to other sites within Wikepedia and then link from those sites back to your article. That will encourage movement back and forth. Turnj (talk) 08:37, 10 December 2011 (UTC)turnj[reply]

This is really well done, but I can't help thinking the History section is a bit cut short. Can you discuss more about how the communication field expanded with the introduction of this theory? What ripples were made right away, or did it take time for people to catch on and use the theory in research?--LaRabiosa (talk) 03:33, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article has accurate references and good explanations about the theory. I could see you made progress on this. But it will be better to explain more about the history part. (same as Larabiosa) User: Mikagu

Wiki Education assignment: Communication Theory and Frameworks Fall 2022

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2022 and 6 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Impulsivemk (article contribs). Peer reviewers: CD1074, Dj922.

— Assignment last updated by Turnj (talk) 16:09, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CCTP 752 - Peer Review- Fall 2022

This article is well developed and the structure is organized in a clear manner. The content is rich and covers most of the elements needed to understand this theory. Nevertheless, there is room for improvement in many sections. I will mention three urgent improvements that could be implemented to elevate the quality of the article and boost its nature as a Wikipedia page. First, there are important keywords in the introduction without links, such as integration, problematic, cognitive… etc. these words are very important for the reader to understand the context of the theory. Second, the theory application section, which is called in the article: Current Usage, could be significantly improved. This section could be presented in sections by category; Health, Organizational Communication, Internal Bureaucracy…etc. Then under each category comes explanations with some practical examples. This structure would facilitate knowledge consumption by readers. Third, there are no visual images to explain the different elements of the theory. Adding some visuals to “The concepts and the “Assumptions” sections could improve the quality of the article significantly. CD1074 (talk) 10:40, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]