Talk:P-adic exponential function

Mathematics Start‑class Low‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

a^p^x

No, I wasn't wrong. a^p^x has no relevance to the p-adic exponential, even if the domains of "a", "p", and "x" weren't different. I was going to say that the concept of a^p^x as used here is totally different than that in double exponential function; it would be, but it isn't even used here. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 21:23, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strassman's theorem and Euler's identity

I don't understand how to apply Strassman's theorem to deduce that there is no analogue to Euler's identity. The coefficients of the exponential function don't converge to zero. Can someone expand on this? 46.123.245.39 (talk) 19:41, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]