Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sensei's Library
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kafziel (talk | contribs) at 14:33, 27 February 2007 (→[[Sensei's Library]]: closed; delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 14:33, 27 February 2007 by Kafziel (talk | contribs) (→[[Sensei's Library]]: closed; delete)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Fails WP:N. Kafziel Talk 14:33, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Sensei's Library (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable wiki that fails WP:WEB - has no coverage from independent reliable sources. Google gets 6 unique hits for "Sensei's Library" (in quotes). [1] Awyong J. M. Salleh 03:45, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. If it's large and active, it doesn't seem to be making a good show of itself. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 04:00, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Go in general doesn't have much English language coverage. Sensei's Library is one of the most useful English Go resources out there and every Go player I talk to knows about the wiki. --Dookama 21:20, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unless some sources are provided. Does not meet WP:N. --Daniel J. Leivick 23:38, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Google lists 3,800 inbound links.[2] The article obviously needs improvement, but subject is clearly well regarded, and improvement is preferable to deletion. --Richard Daly 05:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wiki admins censor contributors and contributions based on self-admitted personal dislikes. --User:Frank de Groot 18:17, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.