Talk:Mutilated chessboard problem/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ovinus (talk · contribs) 18:21, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Shall review over the next few days.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Spotchecks

• [1]:
• [3]:
• [7]:
• [9]:
• [11]:
• [13]:
• [17]:
• [18]:
• [19]:
• [21]:
• [23]:
• [24]:
• [27]:
• [28]:
• [30]:
• [31]:
• [34]:
• [38]: