Talk:Structured concurrency

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Structured concurrency article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

"History" should not enumerate every implementation

> In 2021, Swift adopted structured concurrency. Later that year, a draft proposal was published to add structured concurrency to Java.

I think the point of the History section was to explain the origins of structured concurrency and cite contributors.

The citations for Swift and Java sound like implementations of what was already established. Perhaps there should be a separate section enumerating implementations. Lucenty (talk) 11:37, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]