Talk:Slurm Workload Manager

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software C‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

Linux C‑class Mid‑importance

	Linux portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name

Is is more than a coincidence that the acronym is that of Slurm, a fictional soft drink in the Futurama universe? Group29 (talk) 13:37, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not according to https://computing.llnl.gov/tutorials/moab/. Don't know if it's a valid reference though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.62.218.79 (talk) 13:36, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No reference for slurm usage

I couldn't find any reference for the usage of slurm in the top 10 hpc in the world or that it really used on about 60% of the TOP500 supercomputers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roezohar (talk • contribs) 06:43, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm new to wikipedia so am unfamiliar with normal conventions but I am staff at USC and our old web page (hpcc.usc.edu) is cited as a source for the "60% of TOP500" claim. I'm not sure where that number came from but I don't have evidence to support it. The schedMD website makes the claim of 5 in the top 10 (in 2013) used slurm (https://slurm.schedmd.com/slurm.html). It's likely we got the number from an old Slurm presentation but this claim is not our new webpage (carc.usc.edu). Csul USC (talk) 21:08, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]