Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SCOUT eh! (3rd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Femke (talk) 06:23, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- SCOUT eh! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Organisation doesn't seem to meet WP:NORG- lacks in-depth coverage in independent sources MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:50, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. It is well sourced. Of course the sources are from inside Scouting, but they are mostly independent of this organisation. It has been up for deletion twice before and was kept. I see no reason to delete it now. --Bduke (talk) 01:08, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Scouting, and Canada. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:25, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per comments above. --evrik (talk) 15:23, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per comments above, and comments in previous AfD. -- GreenC 17:51, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.