Jump to content

Talk:Expression vector

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by PrimeBOT (talk | contribs) at 12:54, 16 July 2022 (top: Task 24: combining WikiProject banners following a TFD). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Vital article

WikiProject iconMolecular Biology: Genetics C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of molecular biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

Nadavaluru Giridhar Reddy,Ref:Dr.reddy's labs.

hi this is anand pls send info abt expression vector........ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.123.193 (talk) 09:23, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

pGEX promoter

"Examples of E. coli expression vectors are the pGEX series of vectors where glutathione-S-transferase is used as a fusion partner, and the pET series of vectors which uses a T7 promoter." Both pGEX and pET vectors have a T7 promoter. This sentence implies that only pET vectors do. I changed it. --Felix Tritschler (talk) 20:29, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you are wrong here. See for example here where it says the promoter is tac (i.e. a fusion of lac and trp) promoter. Since this is a commercial site selling the product, I would be inclined to believe it to be true, but if you have other sources that say otherwise do give them. For now the edit will be reverted since there are many sources that say it is not T7. Hzh (talk) 21:21, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for pointing that out, sorry for the confusion, I was wrong.

--Felix Tritschler (talk) 19:09, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]