Arrott plot

Arrott plot for a simple mean field ferromagnetic phase transition. Here, as in the original paper, the relationship is demonstrated as $H$ versus $M^{3}$, but Arrott plots are usually rearranged to $H/M$ versus $M^{2}$. The value of $\epsilon$ denotes whether the temperature is above, below, or at the Curie temperature (see text).

In condensed matter physics, an Arrott plot is a plot of the square of the magnetization $M^{2}$ of a substance, against the ratio of the applied magnetic field to magnetization $H/M$ at one (or several) fixed temperature(s). Arrott plots are an easy way of determining the presence of ferromagnetic order in a material. They are named after American physicist Anthony Arrott who introduced them as a technique for studying magnetism in 1957.

Details

According to the Landau theory applied to the mean field picture for magnetism, the free energy of a ferromagnetic material close to a phase transition can be written as:

$F(M)=-HM+a{\frac {T-T_{c}}{T_{c}}}M^{2}+bM^{4}+\ldots$

where $M$, the magnetization, is the order parameter, $H$ is the applied magnetic field, $T_{c}$ is the critical temperature, and $a,b$ are material constants.

Close to the phase transition, this gives a relation for the magnetization order parameter:

$M^{2}={\frac {1}{4b}}{\frac {H}{M}}-{\frac {a}{2b}}\epsilon$

where $\epsilon ={\frac {T-T_{c}}{T_{c}}}$ is a dimensionless measure of the temperature.

Thus in a graph plotting $M^{2}$ vs. $H/M$ for various temperatures, the line without an intercept corresponds to the dependence at the critical temperature. Thus along with providing evidence for the existence of a ferromagnetic phase, the Arrott plot can also be used to determine the critical temperature for the phase transition.

Generalization

Giving the critical exponents explicitly in the equation of state, Arrott and Noakes proposed:

$({\frac {H}{M_{z}}})^{1/\gamma }={\frac {T-T_{c}}{T_{1}}}+({\frac {M_{z}}{M_{1}}})^{1/\beta }$

Where $T_{1},M_{1},\gamma ,\beta$ are free parameters. In these modified Arrott plots, data is plotted as $M^{1/\beta }$ versus $(H/M)^{1/\gamma }$. In the case of classical Landau theory, $\beta =1/2$ and $\gamma =1$ and this equation reduces to the linear $M^{2}$ versus $H/M$ plot. However, the equation also allows for other values of $\gamma$ and $\beta$, since real ferromagnets often do not have critical exponents exactly consistent with a simple mean field theory ferromagnetism.

The use of the correct critical exponents for a given system can help give straight lines on the Arott plot, but not in cases such as low magnetic field and amorphous materials. While mean field theory is a more reasonable model for ferromagnets at higher magnetic fields, the presence of more than one magnetic domain in real magnets means that especially at low magnetic fields, the experimentally measured macroscopic magnetic field (which is an average over the whole sample) will not be a reasonable way to determine the local magnetic field (which is felt by a single atom). Therefore, magnetization data taken at low magnetic fields should be ignored for the purposes of Arrott plots.

See also

• Curie–Weiss law