Talk:Structural equation modeling
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Structural equation modeling article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months ![]() |
![]() | Statistics C‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
Suggestions from the Membership of the SEM-Net listserv
SEM-Net is a large and longstanding email listserv of people who are interested in Structural Equation Modeling. A group of them, led by Leslie Hayduk, put together a set of suggestions for content for the article. They do not have a lot of experience editing Wikipedia, so they gathered the material and emailed it to me to ask for help converting it to Wiki Markup. I am nearly done with this in my Sandbox, and I will start moving content over to here (Talk page) or to the main article. Suggestions or help moving content both welcome! Prof. Eric A. Youngstrom (talk) 18:36, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Sample size section
"Complexities which increase information demands in structural model estimation increase with the number of potential combinations of latent variables; while the information supplied for estimation increases with the number of measured parameters times the number of observations in the sample size – both are non-linear. Sample size in SEM can be computed through two methods: the first as a function of the ratio of indicator variables to latent variables, and the second as a function of minimum effect, power and significance. Software and methods for computing both have been developed by Westland (2010)."
There is a long history addressing the issues of sample size in SEM. I have edited out what I feel are personal, unfounded and unscientific assertions from an anonymous poster. Indeed this quote is from my research: both the ECRA article and my Springer book "Structural Equation Models: From Path to Network Analysis". (JC Westland)
Software
Hey MrOllie (talk · contribs), I don't think that directing folks to the software implementations of the method counts as a link directory WP:LINKSTOAVOID. [1]
>Researchers using SEM employ software programs (such as Mplus, lavaan (in R), LISREL, OpenMx, SPSS AMOS, Stata)
Would you be ok if we changed the external links to bluelinks?
> Researchers using SEM employ software programs (such as Mplus, lavaan (in R_(programming_language)), LISREL, OpenMx, SPSS AMOS, Stata)
I think that way we wouldn't lose the important information about software without feeling like we're advertising, which I think is your concern