Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snap Circuits

Snap Circuits

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am not sure if this article can ever demonstrate notability. I tried searching for sources and only came up with list sources that are trivial mentions of the article. The official website does make mentions of awards, but I cannot find any awards listed, nor can I find information that would suggest that the product is notable. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 04:32, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do remember using this when I was younger and seeing it in schools, but I do not see any nontrivial coverage. This feels like a case of a topic that should be notable but there is nothing I could find that proves that this article is notable, which means that the topic is possibly not notable. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 04:33, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Toys-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:01, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's a thing, quite a clever thing. It has extensive coverage in educational discussions and books (try the wee Find sources links helpfully provided above). Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 16:16, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I've added some sources already, it really is notable. I also have something for the nominator![1].--Milowent • ^hasspoken 20:04, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Added another source. It's been pretty constantly reviewed and mentioned in "best toy" lists for a few years by major outlets. Skynxnex (talk) 20:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]