Talk:Specials (Unicode block)

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Computing List‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Typography List‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Writing systems List‑class Low‑importance

	Writing portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Where is the summary? I can't figure out how to display one... 205.228.108.57 (talk) 03:33, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am getting these replacement characters on web pages that I have visited many times. They didn't have these characters before. What's going on? (I did get a new computer last year.) AlbertSM (talk) 19:53, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replacement character and mojibake in the Web

I removed a piece of hard PoV in favor of lame webmasters and HTTPd admins, introduced by user: Spitzak and, possibly, another contributors. It would be "obviously superior for the end user" if we all had to die tomorrow, but it is also "obviously" that if there was a strong and continuous pressure against developers of non-compliant HTTPds, lame OS admins and another botchers since 1997, then we would not have today so much text encoding troubles. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:43, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

slash* I pʀopose that "⟨?⟩" should redirect to "Replacement Character". It has such dɪffeʀent ɪnfo that ɪt waʀʀents a sepeʀate aʀtɪcle. UniformMilk192 (talk) 22:12, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ban mojibake and remove Garbage Characters Halloweenboy118 (talk) 14:32, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect

Should be a redirection when you type "�" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E35:8A8D:FE80:51DB:21D8:A022:6B34 (talk) 17:49, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For technical reasons it is not possible to create [[�]] on Wikipedia. BabelStone (talk) 18:58, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rhombus

Why is the replacement character described as a black rhombus with a white question mark when it's a square? Granted, all squares are rhombuses … But then, why not call it a rectangle? Or a quadrilateral? Or even a polygon? Aeron --2A01:CB1D:2E8:D000:223B:609C:AD60:6D0 (talk) 09:06, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm guessing because most fonts (at least on my Windows 11 laptop) use a rhombus for U+FFFD instead of a square. The Unicode chart does use a rotated square but as noted at the top of the chart "The shapes of the reference glyphs used in these code charts are not prescriptive. Considerable variation is to be expected in actual fonts.". DRMcCreedy (talk) 15:18, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]