Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Single Approachable Girl
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 20:41, 25 May 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 20:41, 25 May 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete per WP:SNOW. Lenticel (talk) 00:07, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Single Approachable Girl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
WP:MADEUP Sarcasticninja (talk) 22:22, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Laughing Out Loud. JuJube (talk) 22:55, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete as nonsense. Funny nonsense, but nonsense all the same. Trusilver 23:05, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy KeepG1 this.... as I laugh reading the article. Nonsense for sure. ~Beano~ (talk) (contribs) 00:46, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]- Delete I laughed out loud after reading the conversation and the story. I'm sorry that this will be deleted before anyone gets to read it in context, but the basis for the article was an IM discussion, that closes with "you think I'm easy?" "no...nice." Mandsford (talk) 03:00, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Yeah, this is a case that I really hate to see the article go from a personal standpoint. I have read it four times now and laughed every time. I hope the user finds his way over to Uncyclopedia and recreates it. Trusilver 18:13, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no, lets not have an Article for everyones IM conversations. G1 and possibly G10 material. Exit2DOS2000•T•C• 07:07, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.