This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Izno(talk | contribs) at 17:53, 15 May 2022(std templates). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 17:53, 15 May 2022 by Izno(talk | contribs)(std templates)
Serious encyclopedias: Serious and respected encyclopedias and reference works are generally expected to provide overviews of scientific topics that are in line with respected scientific thought. Wikipedia aspires to be such a respected work.
Obvious pseudoscience: Theories which, while purporting to be scientific, are obviously bogus, such as Time Cube, may be so labeled and categorized as such without more.
Generally considered pseudoscience: Theories which have a following, such as astrology, but which are generally considered pseudoscience by the scientific community may properly contain that information and may be categorized as pseudoscience.
Questionable science: Theories which have a substantial following, such as psychoanalysis, but which some critics allege to be pseudoscience, may contain information to that effect, but generally should not be so characterized.
Alternative theoretical formulations: Alternative theoretical formulations which have a following within the scientific community are not pseudoscience, but part of the scientific process.
A banner for talk pages that lists the Arbitration decision on pseudoscience, as defined at the committee's final decision.
This template is meant to share the Arbitration Committee's decision in all pages related to pseudoscience. The template repeats the guidelines described in that decision in a more digestible format. As these points were authored by the Committee, the precise text should not be altered in any way without clarification at Arbitration Requests for Clarification and Amendment.
