Jump to content

Modal collapse

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Keith D (talk | contribs) at 10:56, 28 April 2022 (top: Fix cite date error). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In modal logic, modal collapse is the condition in which every true statement is necessarily true, and vice versa; that is to say, there are no contingent truths, or to put it another way, that "everything exists necessarily".[1][2] In the notation of modal logic, this can be written as .

In the context of philosophy, the term is commonly used in critiques of ontological arguments for the existence of God and the principle of divine simplicity.[1][3] For example, Gödel's ontological proof contains as a theorem, which combined with the axioms of system S5 leads to modal collapse.[4] Since some regard divine freedom as essential to the nature of God, and modal collapse as negating the concept of free will, this then leads to the breakdown of Gödel's argument.[5]

References

  1. ^ a b Tomaszewski, Christopher (2019-04-01). "Collapsing the modal collapse argument: On an invalid argument against divine simplicity". Analysis. 79 (2): 275–284. doi:10.1093/analys/any052. ISSN 0003-2638.
  2. ^ Schmid, Joseph C. (February 2022). "The fruitful death of modal collapse arguments". International Journal for Philosophy of Religion. 91 (1): 3–22. doi:10.1007/s11153-021-09804-z. ISSN 0020-7047.
  3. ^ Benzmüller, Christoph; Paleo, B. W. (2016). "The Ontological Modal Collapse as a Collapse of the Square of Opposition". doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45062-9_18. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  4. ^ Kovač, Srećko (2012-12-31), Szatkowski, Miroslaw (ed.), "15. Modal Collapse in Gödel's Ontological Proof", Ontological Proofs Today, DE GRUYTER, pp. 323–344, doi:10.1515/9783110325881.323, ISBN 978-3-11-032515-7, retrieved 2022-04-28
  5. ^ Pedersen, Daniel J.; Lilley, Christopher (2022-04-08). "Divine Simplicity, God's Freedom, and the Supposed Problem of Modal Collapse". Journal of Reformed Theology. 16 (1–2): 127–147. doi:10.1163/15697312-bja10028. ISSN 1569-7312.