This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mysticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mysticism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MysticismWikipedia:WikiProject MysticismTemplate:WikiProject MysticismMysticism
Whether or not it should be the canonical title, I don't know - but we should consider that before creating a redirect. The process is known, among Anglophone Quakers in Europe and, from what I can tell, Australia, as Quaker Business Method - I don't know if it is so known by Anglophone Quakers of the Americas. If this is the general term by which it is known - and I can say that it is how it is referred to in academic research in the UK at least - in English, then that should be the title of the article. If not, it should be a redirect. I suggest attempting to find consensus on this before taking either action. SamBC(talk) 11:48, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg?lang=en){kind=small}