Jump to content

Talk:Truth function

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Willondon (talk | contribs) at 20:14, 19 March 2022 (Undid revision 1078090440 by 176.59.53.128 (talk); not related to improving article). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconPhilosophy: Logic Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Logic

"Just in case

On behalf of the general audience, I have replaced the misleading and confusing expression "just in case", with its correct, and easily understood equivalent, "if, and only if" (also, in more technical writing, "if and only if"). The following explains the error:

Comment on definition

Is there a problem with the definition of truth function or truth functional? I mean the first sentence says that a truth function gives a truth output value from a truth input value, but later says about propositional logic, propositional logic gives one truth value, which is either truth or false. Is that not contradictory definition??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Josemazcorro (talkcontribs) 11:55, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]