User:Sigridlokensgard/User:Gsewell1/sandbox/Sigridlokensgard Peer Review
![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
General info
[edit]- Whose work are you reviewing?
Gsewell1
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- User:Gsewell1/sandbox
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
- Yente Serdatzky
Evaluate the drafted changes
[edit]Content
[edit]Shouldn't need any additions to article lead
If the Collected Writings was published in 1913 and she wrote until 1955 then you don't need to specify that it's incomplete
May have too much detail on plot of "Miri," specific events of protagonist's alienation may not be relevant
Also may be more than enough detail on "Confession" to understand themes and social relevance
Summaries of stories' themes are strong, succinct, informative
I could follow it without any more context
Artistic and thematic differences between the periods of Serdatzky's work not clear so need/lack thereof for third story also unclear but I don't think length is an issue if you make other sections more concise
Use of two stories as representatives is a good strategy but make the connections to the rest of Serdatzky's body of work explicit
Need for context established at the opening of the section doesn't seem followed up on except for mention of 1905 rebellion
Good sourcing, could expand article with more perspectives but I know scholarship is limited
Commentary on stories all on political themes, has scholarship been done on artistic value and technique
Article is much more complete with explanations from Serdatzky's body of work
Content is thorough but connections, between different additions and the additions and the wider scope of Serdatzky's career, are unclear
Style
[edit]Flow in opening paragraph is difficult to follow
Aside about feud with Cahan breaks up sentence about Collected Writings, could re-organize
The English title- Yiddish title format (Collected Writings [געקליבענע שריפֿטען]) seems better than the Yiddish- English (מירל ["Mirl"]) for an English article
Yiddish titles are useful for reference but since I don't know Yiddish I don't know how much other words add to the article (something that can't be expressed faithfully in English)
Some style issues with redundant phrasing-- "highlight Serdatzky's demonstrated engagement with topics such as," "the word "war" articulates the battle," "the title comes from the Hebrew word וִדּוּי, referring to the act of confession in the Jewish religion" can all be cut down
Don't know if "intrusive thoughts" is right word choice
I don't think the Yiddish is distracting
Organization
[edit]Maybe organize information about Collected Writings and other publication history separately from "Miri" and "Confession" information
Final sentence of first paragraph sounds like a thesis, I don't know if that's a problem
Overall sounds like an informative essay, also don't know if that's a problem
Could add sub-headings to make section easier to parse