User talk:ព្រះមហាក្សត្ររាជ
ព្រះមហាក្សត្ររាជ, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi ព្រះមហាក្សត្ររាជ! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 7 March 2017 (UTC) |
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from French Guiana into Cayenne. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:41, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
January 2019
Your recent editing history at Template:Largest urban centers of the European Union shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Metropolitan areas is stable version from months, your change has been reverted - disputed changes, if you want new changes, must to be consensus per Wikipedia:CYCLE. This is last warning! Subtropical-man (✉ | en-2) 01:00, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Blanking?
Just FYI, it looks like you accidentally blanked most of Réunion. Not sure what you did there in saving your edit but you might not want to do that again -- I've reverted the change you made. Feel free to re-add the updated figures though. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:25, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
Collaboration at French colonial empire
Thanks for your contributions to French colonial empire. I notice that some of your edits have been reverted, and you've been letting your displeasure be known in edit summary comments, including an unfounded accusation of WP:OWNership. In a cursory evaluation of recent edits, TompaDompa's reverts of your edits are based on sound Wikipedia policy or guidelines, mostly on the basis of inadequate sourcing. Although you've been around for some years, you're still nearly a brand new editor based on your ~500 edits. While nobody likes to have their work reverted, and feeling frustrated is a normal reaction, please do not take it out on other editors, but assume good faith that they are acting to improve the encyclopedia, in this case, by monitoring the WP:Verifiability of the article and removing or altering edits that are non-compliant. If you don't understand the reason for the reverts or don't agree with them, the proper course of action is to raise a discussion on the Talk page to discuss the content disagreement. (I see that that conversation has been started.) Other methods of dispute resolution are available to you, if that doesn't work out. But in the meantime, please keep your cool with other editors, and comment on the article content and how to improve it, not on other editors, both in the edit summary and on the article Talk pages. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my Talk page; you can also get help at the WP:Help desk. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 06:40, 13 March 2022 (UTC)