Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CopBlock.org
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 11:38, 14 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 11:38, 14 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was withdrawn by nominator. No other arguments for deletion. (non-admin closure) Gongshow Talk 04:55, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- CopBlock.org (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Website without any evidence of notability. That its founder is on trial is irrelevant.--Dmol (talk) 23:14, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:29, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep - it was relatively easy to find reliable sources. I added 8, all newspapers, TV, and law journals, and expanded the article somewhat. Clearly meets GNG. GregJackP Boomer! 15:43, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- As the article has been improved and now has good references, I'll withdraw my nomination.--Dmol (talk) 02:24, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.