Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modeling site
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 09:18, 11 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 09:18, 11 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. -- RG2 01:48, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Modeling site (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
blatant advertising Number1spygirl 15:08, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 11:35, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This is far from blatant advertising. There were spam links, but I have now removed them. The page is completely unreferenced, and I have tagged it as such. This page needs a lot of attention, including referencing and clean-up, but it is not blatant advertising. —gorgan_almighty 13:06, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per gorgan_almighty. Once the spam is removed, it's a legitimate (if unreferenced) article. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 16:39, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Unverifiable, non-notable and unsourced WP:OR. --Evb-wiki 17:47, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, I agree with Number1spygirl, needs some work but that's not a reason for deletion. THE KING 12:45, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There's nothing special or notable with such sites to deserve an article and the text is pretty uninformative - models have websites, suprise, suprise. Pavel Vozenilek 00:07, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.