Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extended set theory
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 12:24, 10 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 12:24, 10 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete as patent nonsense. Stifle (talk) 11:57, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Extended set theory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Original Research; used prod tag initially, editor objected, referring to AfD. Zero sharp (talk) 00:00, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Original research. It's borderline patent nonsense, too; I'm reasonably well-versed in mathematics, astrophysics, physical cosmology and religious cosmology, and so I ought to be able to understand an article on this subject. It's as incoherent, in its field, as 'bu ba buff' would be as article content elsewhere. AlexTiefling (talk) 11:05, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.