Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fabform

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:19, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fabform

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON. Online media platform that's been around <2 months with <5k subscribers according to the infobox in a previous revision, which, according to my highly scientific research, is somewhat less than your average 13 year old Minecraft youtuber.

Almost no news coverage, which is unsurprising given how new it is, and even less once you discount coverage of the Oregonian company Fabform Industries. TimothyJosephWood 13:25, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 15:39, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A WP:SPA article on a new YouTube-based proposition. The most substantial coverage is the IndianTelevision.com item, but that is promotional start-up coverage ("Vishal Mull, former executive producer and creative director at Idea Shop, announces his first independent digital content network – ‘FabForm’ that will bring comic and quirky content on-the-go to the country's internet generation...") rather than bylined in-depth analysis. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 15:47, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:06, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per AllyD. I am unable to find sufficient in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. gongshow talk 07:48, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete TOOSOOON and GNG. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 22:38, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.