Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"Dancing Outlaw" Transcript
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 02:40, 10 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 02:40, 10 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 15:52, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- "Dancing Outlaw" Transcript (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Original editor is attempting to build a transcript of the screenplay here. Even if GFDL is secured for the text, it belongs on Wikisource, not Wikipedia. Nothing to transwiki now, but not a clear candidate for speedy deletion. —C.Fred (talk) 22:34, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. I would have tagged it as nocontext, but it would probably get refused. JuJube (talk) 00:11, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete - as of now this is nothing but the promise of OR. No assertion of importance. No possibility of notability or verifiability. Sbowers3 (talk) 01:38, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Gary King (talk) 10:06, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.