Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M-quotient
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 09:58, 8 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 09:58, 8 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Lear's Fool 15:05, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- M-quotient (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable, only reference is blog-like.Gerardw (talk) 01:50, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Malformed nomination fixed. lifebaka++ 23:08, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:28, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Please see h-index, section Alternatives and modifications. Upon reading that section I found that m-quotient is already there, only it's called m-index; using this source [1], I've added the alternate name with the reference into that section, since the definition was the same in both. Nihola (talk) 19:33, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for sound reasons above. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:26, 1 March 2011 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.