Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynamic syntax tree

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn - holiday brainfreeze; I just realized that I was advocating a merge as first solution, so this should be a merge proposal. Will set that up. (non-admin closure) Elmidae (talk · contribs) 11:45, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dynamic syntax tree

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON - concept is only used in publications of the two authors cited in the article (plus a third, Tim Moses, who overwhelmingly appears to co-author with them). No widespread use outside these publications can be found. Indeed, there's a good amount of overlap with use of the term in linguistics, so the name isn't up for grabs. I suggest partial merge to Program analysis, or a suitable more specialized article (not my field). --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 09:17, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 09:29, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 09:29, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.