Talk:Pascal (programming language)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pascal (programming language) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 3 months

Template:Vital article

Pascal (programming language) is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 1, 2008	Featured article candidate	Not promoted

Computing: Software / CompSci C‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing

C

This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Low-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Pascal (programming language). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:59, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Pascal (programming langauge)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pascal (programming langauge). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:29, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Bogged Down"

In the introduction, the article says that the ALGOL X process "Bogged down". I don't understand what this means. From my understanding, it could mean the process slowed down on its own, but also could mean that the process was slowed down by the introduction of ALGOL W. I think the article would benefit if someone ~~corrected~~ clarified this. Bepvte (talk) 00:10, 30 November 2019 (UTC); edited 00:53, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what happened either. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 00:13, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's an informal and unreferenced phrase tht we're trying to interpret here, so maybe no really clear outcome is achievable. (And the phrase should probably be replaced, either way - with owt clearer if we can clarify usefully, and with owt less obscure, less vague, if not.)

The Algol X article tells a lot, via its links and references - mainly the November 2016 paper, ALGOL X and ALGOL Y, listed as an external link; the article's references 5 and 6 may be worth a look too. In summary, it seems tht the IFIP Working Group drew together all the right people, but they delegated to a small subcommittee which split and the work stalled: Wirth stepped away, continuing independently.

I remember reading much nearer the time tht Niklaus Wirth had shared his ideas, on an Algol-60 successor, with a colleague on (? ) the IFIP Group's subcommittee; and had been astonished (? putting it politely) when that colleague put forward proposals in a very different spirit at the subcommittee's next meeting.

A lovely story I also read was tht from time to time people would ask Wirth how to pronounce his name; and he would reply using Algol-60 terms: tht "in Europe they tend to call me by name [the correct form, tht one might spell in English as veert]; but in America people call me by value [worth]."

– SquisherDa (talk) 02:11, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I love that quote. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 02:19, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can U source it?? It really ought to go in the article on him if we can!! – SquisherDa (talk) 02:24, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merger Proposal (VSI Pascal)

I propose merging VSI Pascal into this article. I think the information from that article can be condensed and added to Pascal (programming language)#Other variants without making this article too long. Vt320 (talk) 20:04, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems OK to merge to me. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 03:01, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm unsure. Several variations have their own article. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 04:06, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]