Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dangerously irrelevant
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 12:01, 3 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 12:01, 3 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Withdrawn by nominator. NAC. Reyk YO! 04:15, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Dangerously irrelevant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Sounds very hoax-y to me. Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 02:40, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I can't comment on the accuracy, but it isn't made up. WillOakland (talk) 03:31, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. —Nsk92 (talk) 03:37, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This has a decent history, never been AFD'd till now. Somebody involved with the physics project want to offer an expert opinion on this to gain consensus? --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:45, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Per Will0akland. I guess it's not a hoax after all.Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 03:59, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.