Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Organization for Understanding Cluster Headaches
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 04:28, 1 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 04:28, 1 February 2022 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Organization for Understanding Cluster Headaches (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:ORG. A mere 5 gnews hits [1]. LibStar (talk) 09:45, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:27, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and Rewrite It appears the UK arm of this group, the Organisation for the Understanding of Cluster Headaches, is fairly notable: [2]. I wouldn't be in such a rush to delete this one. Warrah (talk) 17:49, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:14, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I have tagged this article for rescue. SilverserenC 03:18, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and Rewrite I have added the links about the UK organization in there. I agree that the UK one is far more notable than the US one and the article should be rewritten to reflect that. SilverserenC 03:18, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and Rewrite The UK arm meets WP:ORG ([3], [4], and [5]) and there's plenty of available information on which to base an article -ALLOCKE|talk 01:33, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and Rewrite Comments above are correct. There is material for improvement. --DThomsen8 (talk) 21:05, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.