Jump to content

Talk:Software Guard Extensions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rustamabd (talk | contribs) at 21:58, 28 January 2022 (SGX dropped in new processors). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconComputing: Software / Security C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computer security (assessed as Mid-importance).
Things you can help WikiProject Computer security with:
Article alerts are available, updated by AAlertBot. More information...
  • Review importance and quality of existing articles
  • Identify categories related to Computer Security
  • Tag related articles
  • Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
  • Identify articles for improvement
  • Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
  • Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Untitled

Whoever added this section https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_Guard_Extensions#Plundervolt only put a link in there. I think this is bad editing practice because it does not convey any information. We could at least cite some paragraphs from the link here.

--Zenulabidin2k (talk) 11:51, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like this page could be improved, because, although it provides details on feature presence and support, and cites some software which uses the feature, it does not provide any description at all of how the feature actually enables an application to protect a memory range.

If nobody has an issue, I'll try to read some literature on the details of the feature and try and add at least a paragraph. Thanks.

Andy (talk) 13:51, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SGX dropped in new processors

Apparently Intel is dropping SGX in new processors.

GA-RT-22 (talk) 17:08, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It would be very interesting to know the reasoning behind dropping it. - Rustamabd (talk) 21:58, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]