Wikipedia talk:Attribution does not require blame
Appearance
"Blame" term
As mentioned in the Glossary section, Git's command is blame
. Apache Subversion (SVN) uses blame
also, while Concurrent Versions System (CVS) and Mercurial use annotate
.
I am open to another term, but "blame" has widespread adoption. Flatscan (talk) 05:36, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
RD1 discussions
I searched for and found many discussions about WP:Revision deletion#1 and attribution requirements.
- WT:Revision deletion/Archive 1#Community consultation (2009)
- WT:Copying within Wikipedia/Archive 1#Article history cleanup, future Revision deletions (2009)
- WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive220#Revision deletion needed (2010)
- WP:Copyright problems/2011 November 11
- WT:Revision deletion/Archive 4#RD1 wording (2014)
- WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive264#Revdel requests (RD1) (2014)
- WT:Revision deletion#RfC on Change RD1-wording (2017)
- WP:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive947#Inappropriate revision deletion at Beating of Ken Tsang (2017)
- WP:Copyright problems/2017 April 28
- WT:Copyrights/Archive 16#RD1 in case of old edits (2020)
- WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive332#Copyvio that persisted for 13 years (2021)
- WT:Revision deletion#RD1, attribution and intervening edits (2021)
- WP:Administrators' noticeboard#Revdel on Himachal Pradesh (2022, ongoing)