Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canon (basic principle)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Uanfala (talk | contribs) at 18:01, 29 December 2021 (Created page with '{{SUBST:afd2|pg={{SUBST:#titleparts:{{SUBST:FULLPAGENAME}}||2}}|cat=S|text=A short article of about three paragraphs that lists several meanings of the English word ''canon'' and then gives examples of each of the two more prominent ones (a basic principle and a body of works). There's nothing that ties the whole together, and the sourcing consists entirely of dictionaries or texts that use the word. The article can be reverted to its pre-2019 state, where...'). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Canon (basic principle) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A short article of about three paragraphs that lists several meanings of the English word canon and then gives examples of each of the two more prominent ones (a basic principle and a body of works). There's nothing that ties the whole together, and the sourcing consists entirely of dictionaries or texts that use the word.

The article can be reverted to its pre-2019 state, where it was solely about canons as basic principles, but even that doesn't appear to be a distinct encyclopedic topic different from, say, Principle. I don't see relevant entries in Encyclopedia Britanica, the online Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, or in Borchert's 10-volume Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2nd ed, 2006). There are corresponding articles only in the Dutch, Frisian and Uzbek wikipedias (see canon (Q5033171)); the first two are about canons as bodies of works, not as basic principles.

I doubt there is potential for an article about the word as such, and I don't see anything in the disparate collection of its meanings that a broad-concept article could latch onto. – Uanfala (talk) 18:01, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]