User talk:PutThisUserNameInNotes

December 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Sherlock Holmes (2009 film), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 18:05, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Sixth Sense without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DonIago (talk) 21:53, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Wonder Woman (2017 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonQuixote (talk) 00:10, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Wonder Woman (2017 film), you may be blocked from editing. --67.183.139.157 (talk) 00:20, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Wonder Woman (2017 film). DonQuixote (talk) 01:04, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You have been blocked for one week for edit warring, adding unsourced content, lying in edit summaries and personal attacks. Cullen328 (talk) 18:53, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

PutThisUserNameInNotes (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I abused the editing resource by pushing my POV, but I promise not to do this again. Please unblock me, and I promise I won’t misuse the editing feature of Wikipedia.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I abused the editing resource by pushing my POV, but I promise not to do this again. Please unblock me, and I promise I won’t misuse the editing feature of Wikipedia. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I abused the editing resource by pushing my POV, but I promise not to do this again. Please unblock me, and I promise I won’t misuse the editing feature of Wikipedia. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I abused the editing resource by pushing my POV, but I promise not to do this again. Please unblock me, and I promise I won’t misuse the editing feature of Wikipedia. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

PutThisUserNameInNotes (talk) 23:01, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]