Talk:Reconstruction and Development Programme
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Reconstruction and Development Programme article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
HI.I have a project which requires a critical analysis of the RDP and I would like to know if you think the RDP has done a good job and please a reason to motivate your answer.
RDP
RESULTS ACHIEVED BY RDP IN ANY TWO SERVICES BY THE GOVERNMENT — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.134.130.217 (talk) 18:45, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
RDP register
Am amogelang Zwane ,I want to register for RDP house online, because we are many in my family living in one house so I want u to help get a house for my family, I live in dibate village, house number 20235 please I need help. 41.13.104.248 (talk) 13:05, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- All unassessed articles
- Start-Class South Africa articles
- Low-importance South Africa articles
- WikiProject South Africa articles
- Start-Class Africa articles
- Low-importance Africa articles
- WikiProject Africa articles
- Start-Class International development articles
- Low-importance International development articles
- WikiProject International development articles