Wikipedia:Peer review/Constant-recursive sequence/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
I've listed this article for peer review because I have been working on expansions and improvements to the article, hoping to (eventually) get it to GA status. Looking for feedback on all aspects of the article which would need to be fixed or improved to have a feasible chance for GA. This is my first time posting a peer review, apologies if I got anything wrong! Thanks! Caleb Stanford (talk) 22:07, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- Preliminary comment: In WT:WPM#Linear recurrence relations there was a consensus for merging this article, Linear difference equation, and the relevant content of Recurrence relation into a single article called Linear recurrence with constant coefficients. It seems that this merge must be done before any peer review. D.Lazard (talk) 23:08, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- User:D.Lazard Thanks! I agree that the current set of 3 articles should be merged. If you believe there is still a consensus for that change, I can do it. Should I first merge into Constant-recursive sequence and then add a TODO to rename, create the article Linear recurrence with constant coefficients and copy over, or something else? FWIW the article name I would prefer is Linear recurrence sequence, but anything which avoids "recursive" I am happy with, and I don't think having the name of the article be the sequence vs the relation makes such a huge difference. Caleb Stanford (talk) 23:19, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
- None of the above. MOVE, do not copy, this article to the better title, and then merge. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:12, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- User:D.Lazard Thanks! I agree that the current set of 3 articles should be merged. If you believe there is still a consensus for that change, I can do it. Should I first merge into Constant-recursive sequence and then add a TODO to rename, create the article Linear recurrence with constant coefficients and copy over, or something else? FWIW the article name I would prefer is Linear recurrence sequence, but anything which avoids "recursive" I am happy with, and I don't think having the name of the article be the sequence vs the relation makes such a huge difference. Caleb Stanford (talk) 23:19, 18 November 2021 (UTC)