Jump to content

Talk:Linear recurrence with constant coefficients

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Caleb Stanford (talk | contribs) at 18:51, 7 November 2021 (Clarify whether eventually-periodic sequences are allowed?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconMathematics C‑class Low‑priority
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Clarify whether eventually-periodic sequences are allowed?

The article does not really clarify whether the following sequence: is a valid solution? According to the definition, it might be because it satisfies the following linear difference equation: . This is consistent with the article saying that the equation holds for "the values of the elements of a sequence" (emphasis mine).

However, it would not be allowed if the equation must hold for all , rather than just . And my impression is that most of the results in the article (e.g., closed formula in powers of the characteristic roots) would not hold for eventually-periodic sequences. Caleb Stanford (talk) 18:51, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]