Jump to content

Talk:Integration using Euler's formula

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Uddhav9 (talk | contribs) at 15:31, 30 October 2021 (Copied and pasted from another site: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconMathematics C‑class Mid‑priority
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-priority on the project's priority scale.

Misleading title?

The title of this article seems misleading, since the term integration using complex analysis would usually be construed as meaning things like the residue calculus. Michael Hardy (talk) 15:15, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think about the title "Complexifying the integral"? This is the terminology used by Prof. Mattuck of MIT [1] Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 19:48, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

'extremely tedious' simply not true

It is just as straightforward to solve the 2nd integral using trig identities, no more than 3 lines of working using a total of 2 trig identities.

'extremely tedious' is in fact, extremely misleading — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikidness69 (talkcontribs) 05:52, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copied and pasted from another site

Seems like most if the stuff has been simply copied and pasted from this site: https://handwiki.org/wiki/Integration_using_Euler%27s_formula#:~:text=In%20integral%20calculus%2C%20Euler's%20formula,i%20x%20and%20then%20integrated.

Please confirm Uddhav9 (talk) 15:31, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]