Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynamic syntax tree (2nd nomination)

Dynamic syntax tree

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been based on citations to a single author (David Syman) for years. I've done some checking and I can't find any refs independent of this author (there is a group of 2-3 individuals who coauthor papers on this subject with each other). The only use of this concept seems to be a product called 'Security Reviewer' - and all three authors are employed by this company. I don't think this meets WP:GNG as there are no independent references, so this article should be deleted. MrOllie (talk) 13:29, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:04, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge (very selectively) to Program analysis or similar article. I fired off an abortive AfD for this four years ago then realized it should be a merge proposal - which I then never set up. This may be worth a short mention within an article on the wider topic, but it's definitely not notable enough for a standalone. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 15:41, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:04, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:17, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I can't find any independent coverage of this as a topic, so I think it doesn't meet WP:GNG. Happy to see it merged if Elmidae thinks there's something mergeable here, but it's not clear to me what material should be salvaged elsewhere. Ajpolino (talk) 18:05, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]