Talk:Structural equation modeling
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Structural equation modeling article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months ![]() |
![]() | Statistics C‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
Sample size section
"Complexities which increase information demands in structural model estimation increase with the number of potential combinations of latent variables; while the information supplied for estimation increases with the number of measured parameters times the number of observations in the sample size – both are non-linear. Sample size in SEM can be computed through two methods: the first as a function of the ratio of indicator variables to latent variables, and the second as a function of minimum effect, power and significance. Software and methods for computing both have been developed by Westland (2010)."
There is a long history addressing the issues of sample size in SEM. I have edited out what I feel are personal, unfounded and unscientific assertions from an anonymous poster. Indeed this quote is from my research: both the ECRA article and my Springer book "Structural Equation Models: From Path to Network Analysis". (JC Westland)